Interesting reading as usual well done mate
Interesting reading as usual well done mateOnly two more upgrades to go mate. 3.2 then V8. Give it 6 weeks and you'll be there!![]()
Be intersting to see the performace pal, I have a guy near me that has a 3.0l lump knocking about,Well it all started with my old M. Might end up going back to another M if I kill this engine. Or I’ll just bite the bullet and buy a crate motor.
@Sean d it’s not that bad. Just take your time and think things through. What’s becoming more clear is how many engine bits and systems share parts. Weather they have the same part number or not they do the right function.
Be intersting to see the performace pal, I have a guy near me that has a 3.0l lump knocking about,
Afraid not palFood for thought! If you have the TU engine it’s almost a straight swap.
Speedy update.
The 3.0 engine is now in!!! Less than 24/h turnaround.

Have you used wingnuts?
they are easier to undo..... just sayin'![]()
I'm just chuffed it's sorted and it wasn't mesome nugget
Who cares if it's sorted......I'm just chuffed it wasn't me![]()
I'm just chuffed it's sorted and it wasn't me![]()
So she runs and pulls well, albeit using far to much fuel in the process. I only got 160miles from a whole tank. Correct M54 parts on route along with ECU to make things more stable. I'm suprised she runs at all really with the 2.8 ECU running the 3.0 block.
View attachment 109361
Do we tell people it took 40mins to remove the gearbox.![]()

Probably best not to, they'll all want their gearboxes taken out...Do we tell people it took 40mins to remove the gearbox.![]()

Thats good to hear, when do I drop Willow offDo we tell people it took 40mins to remove the gearbox.![]()

Would the ecu that was in place for the 2.2 run the 3.0 Lee?
Or did that get binned when you went to the 2.8?
Interrupting the interesting thread
Dave
Do we tell people it took 40mins to remove the gearbox.![]()
Do we tell people it took 40mins to remove the gearbox.![]()

