Here comes the white stuff.

I owned one, great for in town but that's it (even though they do 140 km ph max) Ever seen the crash test done on one of these things? That is where the "Kinematics" come into play.
Not seen it, impressive?
 
Yeah, agreed Mike. Wouldn't drive a Smart car further than my drive if I'm honest. Just so small that my brain tells me I'm in trouble.

Good little cars, if they are used for what they were built for.
Used to be a member on a Smart forum, people were going on holidays in them down to Italy etc...o_O
 
To continue off topic, the results of crash test are impressive when the car is crumpled by design and the passenger cell stays intact and even the doors can be opened after 30 mph into a solid block.
Even the z3 have impact crush zones in the front and rear bumpers they are the bits that bolt onto the front and rear chassis legs and have a weak point in they so should deform upto approx 5 mph and no damage to the rest of the car structurally.

I saw a lorry once that had hit a car and the chassis was straightened on that, the repairers said it took some serious pulling to realign the main chassis rails, the car was totalled.
 
O my goodness :p
I can't believe the state of that car :(
 
OK, right, to get back on topic, the Smart is bloody good fun on a snow covered car park with its SWB & RWD....:D
 
I have always thought... If they built cars with the thickness of the older cars.. (My early Ford MK IV Zodiac had thick steel... a two person job to replace a front wing )... with the modern rustproofing we have.. They would all go out of business as you would never need to buy a new car.. As for crumple zones.. well that was what you hit...
I know what you mean Paul but thicker metal equals more weight, more strain on the engine, less MPG. Engines wear more quickly and the car itself may be more dangerous to others in the event of an accident. Have you ever seen a VW polo after it's been hit by a land rover 90 td5. Not a pretty sight I can assure you!

Mike
 
Oh, yes sorry mate. The tyre bay lads have first dibs on those.lol.=))
Our Gary's wishing his boss had put winter tyres on his works Vivaro van, as he hit some black ice on a back country road yesterday morning and put it on its roof! :(

Tony.

Following our Gary's mishap the other day, he finally showed me some pictures tonight.
015.webp

Ended up facing the opposite direction from which he was originally going, you may be amazed at how often this is how they end up, facing back the way they came.
016.webp

Gary trying to take in what had just happened to him and Eddie.

Some of you will remember the "Rally Stage" near Willingham, well this a few miles away and is part of September's pre lunch bimble. But, don't worry it won't be frosty then.;):) @Grumpy @Rha @Mint @Antm72

Tony.
 
Last edited:
I bet you were glad you found out he was ok before you saw the photo's, scary stuff.
Weather not looking too good over the next few days so take care everybody :)
 
It looks worse than it is really Pauline, yes they were lucky and testament to the fact that he said he wasn't going fast is that it only just managed to make it onto it's roof. Luckily it didn't roll over and over or they may have been hurt.;)

Tony.
 
That's what I suffered Jim, I was stationary waiting to turn right in my old Granada Ghia and this kid in a 4x4 pick up thrutched me up the boot.

Tony.

ps. "Thrutched" is a Blaster Bates terminology.
The company I work for insists that we use hire cars rather than our own for company business on journeys more than 100 miles. However, you only get small cars (fiesta sized and smaller). HR also don't understand the NCAP system quoting the fact that they are all 5* cars. Go read the small print folks.

Having been hit from behind (by an 42 tonne truck) and also in a head on, I simply refuse to use their hire cars. I'm not compromising my personal safety so they can save £10. Give me a large 5*NCAP car anytime.
 
Brrrr. Don't like it! Switch it off please.:(

Tony.
 
Back
Top