Where's it coming from?I am not getting a Tribute kit.
Where's it coming from?I am not getting a Tribute kit.
The airbag light has to extinguish after some seconds not at the same time as the ignition light. This is to stop people doing exactly this con. Years ago when Ford Granadas first came with ABS (and suffered many expensive problems) the con then was to connect a feed from the alternator to the ABS to put the light out when the engine started, which is why the tester now has to wait a few seconds for all warning lights to go out.I presume the only 'test' done on airbags during an MOT is to check the 'airbag' light goes out with the ignition on, to confirm the airbag system has no faults....is this correct? An airbag is a single use piece of equipment so they can't tell if it physically works, or is actually physically there, just rely on the monitoring system.
If the above is correct, then what about rigging an 'airbag' light in parallel with the battery/ ignition light? Then putting (removable) 'airbag' stickers in the correct places on the trim? I could tell a tester the driver's airbag was fitted into the steering column and would inflate through the spokes of my wooden steering wheel. He would not be able to prove otherwise without putting an OBD reader onto the car (which isn't done yet). Thinking out loud here. What do we think of that idea?
I am aware of all that. My issue was building a car that potentially I can't legally drive, let alone safely. I think I have it sorted in my head now though!If you don't like grey areas, then I'm not sure kits cars are for you.
The external Z3 body panels are part of the crumple zone. A Z3 bonnet will withstand some damage and slow the car down before you feel the pain of impact - a fibreglass bonnet will just explode into a million pieces. The front bumper cross member is often removed and is also part of the crumple zone, as are the hangers for it.
You are changing the weight distribution and this may cause unexpected oversteer or understeer.
The standard seats are the height they are so there is no need for roll hoops. Swapping the seats for something "period" means your roll-over protection is reduced. Non-standard seats are not rated for the Z3, and are probably secured using bracing that hasn't been crash tested.
Any suspension modifications are to your specification (as the weight of the car is different), and haven't been tested to the same extent as BMW will have done with the originals (or any aftermarket manufacturers).
The standard body shape is aerodynamically stable to 155mph. The kit car body was designed by a man in a shed.
I'm sure there's more.
Egham!Where's it coming from?
What did you decide then?. . . . I think I have it sorted in my head now though!
It's a forum member; not sure I should say but it's a very close copy of the old DNA 250 cali kit.What did you decide then?
Egham? What kit are you considering? Who makes it? No problem. I'm just curious.
I would NOT trust the high back seats in a roll over, they will not take a load!The standard seats are the height they are so there is no need for roll hoops. Swapping the seats for something "period" means your roll-over protection is reduced. Non-standard seats are not rated for the Z3, and are probably secured using bracing that hasn't been crash tested.
Wow, we are getting into the technical 'nuances' here now.Since we have dipped into this can of worms lets get into another aspect of airbag removal we haven't spoken about yet.
Lets talk passenger side first if your zed 3 came from the factory without a passenger airbag it has a different seatbelt fitted than ones with airbag fitted as with the airbag it has load limited seatbelt designed in conjunction with the pre tensioner system ( also inop once air bag removed) to take out excess slack then control the forward load to allow the person to meet the airbag at the right speed and moment.
The issue is this is also fitted to the drivers side seatbelt but unlike the passenger side there will be no rhd non limited belt for the offside as drivers airbag standard on a z3 .
The risk is obviously clattering head off wheel due to no srs systems.
Possible solution would be a offside seatbelt from a lhd car without a passenger airbag.
Real oem does list the part numbers for the seat belts with and without Force Limiters.
So for all you guys out the with no bag your seatbelt is no longer suitable.
View attachment 279803
Stephen.
I’ve covered close to 3000 miles this year in the 507, and lots of that is motorway and dual carriageway.Wow, we are getting into the technical 'nuances' here now.
I look at it this way:
I want a 1960s replica. The Z3 happens to be the car that 'fits' what I want.
In the 1960s and 1970s there were no such things as airbags, or pedestrian safety systems, or crumple zones on cars.
I, for one, am not doing this to be 'safe'. I am doing it because I want the look of the car I like. I have had a very modern Volvo, it was super safe but extremely boring.
I could go and buy a Triumph Stag (or any other car of the period) from 1975 for a lot less money. It would have rudimentary seatbelts, no crash protection but still be legal on UK roads.
All I want is to be able to drive it on UK roads, should I wish to (which I probably won't very often).
I doubt anyone (with any brains) would rebody a Z3 and use it as everyday transport up and down Britain's motorways or A roads.
Our z3 is used all year round. I'll use it more once it's rebodied.I doubt anyone (with any brains) would rebody a Z3 and use it as everyday transport up and down Britain's motorways or A roads.
I will make the lack of airbags known when getting (specialist no doubt) insurance.MOT Regs aside, if you remove the airbag from your car and have a crash your insurance will be null and void, period.