I recently replied to the thread "NEWBIE PETE". I'm certainly glad to welcome a new member to our fold. In his opening post, @PeteZ3 said: "this is my first car, im 20". This got me thinking back to my first car which was an Alfa Romeo 1964 Spyder Veloce. I had learned to drive using my parents cars, but this was MY first car. It was quite a thrill and quite a car. Reading @PeteZ3 's remark about it being his FIRST car the thought occurred to me that I couldn't quite resolve. Perhaps some of the members can elucidate this idea. It is this: Is it better for a new driver to have a Z3 for his (or her) first car, or own other cars first? Can anyone fully appreciate the beauty of owning such a fine machine without the knowledge of less superior cars? Had I not owned the Alfa, I might never have appreciated the beauty and joy of owning and driving such a fine machine. But the knowledge of just HOW good it was, only developed from driving other cars that did not live up to the same standard. My gut reaction was that one should drive a Z as soon as possible and that should they, for some reason, lose the use of the Z, they have something to aim for in trying to acquire another. If that is no longer possible, at least they have had the Z experience. What are your feelings on this?...............Frankie