
1999 BMW Z3 1962 Ferrari 250 California Evocation by Ludi...
Highly detailed 250 replica by Ludis Car 8 of 36 built Classically finished in Rosso Corsa with Creme leather Commissioned by seller to r...

I was surprised that the reserve was set so low TBH. The seller paid a LOT of money for that to be built.
It is a very authentic replica, especially the interior.
Don't think it will break any records, though.
I can't show my wife if it achieves less than £50k, or she will divorce me. I can't afford that, either!
My wife nearly fell through the floor when there was a locomotive trust on the telly saying that their loco cost £50k to get on track, and I said that was around the same as fake Ferrari outsideI was surprised that the reserve was set so low TBH. The seller paid a LOT of money for that to be built.
It is a very authentic replica, especially the interior.
Don't think it will break any records, though.
I can't show my wife if it achieves less than £50k, or she will divorce me. I can't afford that, either!
The registration on the car is different to the V5C.It also hasn't been re-registered with the DVLA. Still shows as a Z3, which could hamper the value IMO.
The number has been changed but it is still registered as a BMW Z3. For the kind of money they expect it should be registered correctly as a 250 California.The registration on the car is different to the V5C.
There is a good argument for both IMO, depending on which side of the fence you are.A kit car, which is what these things are, should be registered as the original donor vehicle.
Tony
What "Should" be done is to obey the law.A kit car, which is what these things are, should be registered as the original donor vehicle.
Tony
Are you allowed to give it whatever name you like?What "Should" be done is to obey the law.
The law allows rebody'ers to fill in the DVLA Form V627/1 which is used to declare where the bits for the kit came from. It's a points based form where different components add up to different number of points and if enough parts come from a single donor then the car keeps its original registration number. Otherwise it might get a 'Q' or even have to go through a full IVA.
But one element of the form is that it also allows the car to have its description (ie make model) changed to reflect what the builder wants to call his creation.
@Dxbolton, for example, (If I'm not mistaken) completed that form and, as is his right, changed the description to reflect what he built.
I, on the other hand, believe that I have simply added a full body kit to my Z3 but it's still a Z3 and is registered and insured as such. (ie insured as a z3 with full body kit and fibreglass panels). I might even put a z3 badge on the back.
But in the case of us 507'ers we still have BMW badges. If I was plod I'd be pulling over that ferrero that appears to driving on plates stolen from a BMW.
Anyway. To cut a long story short the DVLA allows rebody'ers and kit car builders to name (ie make/model) their creations if they wish and who are to say it's right or wrong.
Yes within reason. You couldn't use the F word though.Are you allowed to give it whatever name you like?
Why not? I call mine the 'F' word all the time, so it's used to it by now.Yes within reason. You couldn't use the F word though.