Well I've bought two ///Ms and on both everything perishable/ wearable was original and needed replacing but I didn't spent the silly money that some of these are going for, regardless of mileage that car is 19 years old, if there is history showing upgrades / replacement then great, if not its worth 13k absolute tops IMO. People get hung up on low mileage, this does not mean a great car, it just means low mileage, I've said this before I would rather buy a higher mileage Zed from a enthusiast that has loved it and spent money on it and treated it to the replacement parts it needs, than a low mileage Zed that was getting on for 20 yrs old and had nothing replaced. Low mileage is nothing more than a status symbol IMO that is worthless if the car isn't right. ... just because its low mileage. Point of fact I went to look at a 27k miles ///M last year (mileage verified) and it was not a patch, not even close to the standard of my 106k ///M.
... buyer beware it could cost you an extra 3k on top of a 17k to 19k ///M and the same is true for any Zed don't worry about the mileage look at the history. There are cars owned on this forum with over 100k on the clock that I would pay good money to own because they have cherished them and spent the necessary money on. (Sorry for the rant)
)
