We've got 19" 326's fitted to our e89 and as the rears are close to needing replacing, we are debating the change from RFT's to non RFT's.
I've trawled through loads of previous posts on the subject and the general consensus seems that it is the way forward for ride quality, handling, cost and avoiding the dreaded cracked alloys. However, a couple of points have been raised that I can't find answers to.
There are suggestions of increasing the profile of the rears from 30 to 35, changing to a 255/35R19 would increase the diameter by an inch, but I've read that 225/35R19's which would only be 0.2 inches bigger in diameter, aren't wide enough. Would a straight replacement with a non RFT of the same size be enough?
Also as RFT's are a standard manufacturer fit, has anyone notified or had issues with insurance companies claiming that swapping them is classed as a modification?
I've trawled through loads of previous posts on the subject and the general consensus seems that it is the way forward for ride quality, handling, cost and avoiding the dreaded cracked alloys. However, a couple of points have been raised that I can't find answers to.
There are suggestions of increasing the profile of the rears from 30 to 35, changing to a 255/35R19 would increase the diameter by an inch, but I've read that 225/35R19's which would only be 0.2 inches bigger in diameter, aren't wide enough. Would a straight replacement with a non RFT of the same size be enough?
Also as RFT's are a standard manufacturer fit, has anyone notified or had issues with insurance companies claiming that swapping them is classed as a modification?