Simon Blythe
Zorg Guru (I)
Just a thought - if the 3.0l is such a sort after and well performing car, why don't a lot of later Z3 owners (namely the 2.8's) just put in a 3.0l and get the same performance?
I think 0-60 is 1 second quicker in the 3.0lThat's understandable - I suppose the difference between the two in the real world isn't massive.
The M is only half a second quicker 0-60I'm not sure it's just the small extra power. The 3.0 is probably now a rarer car than a Z3M. Production numbers were slightly less anyway and I would imagine there are certainly more Ms left than 3.0s. Certainly there are always more Ms for sale.
Yet the 3.0 is not a million miles off the performance of an M (in my head, others will not all agree) albeit without the panache but typically at a 1/3rd of the price.
I want a 3.0 because I see it as special due to the above - and they are to my mind without doubt the best current investment of any model. They are also all generally newer than the Ms if that's a consideration and conceivably less thrashed by original owners.
I don't want a 2.8 as I'm not really a speed freak.
You should get at least 5k for the 2 of them, your M seats are worth a grandI must admit if I could get 5 - 6k for my two 2.8's I would and jump into a 3.0
They don't seem to over price them like others@Sean d my car was once sold by that dealer in Holsworthy, as it's down as one of the previous owners. They sell loads of Z3's and are Z3 specialists
Nothing wrong with a 3.0 auto, you get the best of both worlds with that box.Its a shame this is an auto, got some good bits and M mirrors only 91000 and correctly priced at 5K
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/BMW-Z3-3-...632011?hash=item361346a98b:g:QA4AAOSwOgdYsFZX
I prefer manual Mike but I think I will have no choice soon as the wife is taking her test in an autoNothing wrong with a 3.0 auto, you get the best of both worlds with that box.
Are they tip tronic as well MikeI always preferred manual until I bought the Zed.